Key facts of the case - The place of worship of the applicant was closed by decision of the competent authority for safety reasons (use of electric material and candles without declaration nor control from the fire service); the applicant claimed the suspension of that decision.

Main reasoning of the court - The suspension was denied on the grounds of the existence of other Evangelical places of worship (churches) in the neighborhood, so that the damage was nor grave nor irreparable. The restrictive measure was considered a justified limitation of religious freedom.